[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":316},["ShallowReactive",2],{"bookItem:good-calories-bad-calories":3,"nYSji2t6av":191},{"item":4,"relatedBooks":77,"relatedNews":130,"relatedSoftware":158},{"slug":5,"name":6,"meta_title":7,"meta_description":8,"overview":9,"cover":10,"main_content":11,"book_authors":12,"publisher":14,"publisher_url":15,"publisher_affiliate_link":16,"publication_year":17,"isbn_13":18,"page_count":19,"formats":20,"language":25,"score":26,"favourite":27,"price_low":28,"price_high":28,"best_for":29,"featured_quote":30,"key_takeaways":31,"pros":35,"cons":38,"author_slug":42,"author":43,"tags":66,"date_created":72,"date_updated":72,"category_slugs":73,"category_names":75,"primary_category_slug":74},"good-calories-bad-calories","Good Calories, Bad Calories: Fats, Carbs, and the Controversial Science of Diet and Health","Good Calories, Bad Calories - Mind Wobble Review","Gary Taubes's dense, ambitious revisionist history of nutrition science - intellectually serious, selectively argued, and the origin of a movement.","Gary Taubes's ambitious, dense revisionist history of nutrition science - intellectually important, selectively argued, and the origin text of the modern low-carb movement.","/images/books/good-calories-bad-calories/cover.jpg","Good Calories, Bad Calories is the book that launched a thousand low-carb arguments. Gary Taubes, a science journalist with a track record of long-form investigative work, published it in 2007 to immediate controversy. At 640 pages of densely argued revisionist history, it set out to dismantle the consensus that dietary fat was the primary driver of obesity and heart disease, and to replace it with an alternative hypothesis centring carbohydrates and insulin. The book was praised by some researchers as a much-needed corrective and attacked by others as a selectively argued polemic. Nearly two decades later, it remains the intellectual origin text of the modern low-carb movement - and a book that subsequent research, including studies Taubes himself helped fund, has partially undermined. A Mind Wobble review has to hold both of those facts at once.\n\n## What the book covers\n\nTaubes's project is enormous in scope. The first half of the book is a forensic history of how the low-fat dietary consensus was established in the United States between the 1950s and the 1980s. Taubes traces the political, institutional, and scientific dynamics that led Ancel Keys's diet-heart hypothesis - the idea that dietary saturated fat raises cholesterol, which causes heart disease - to become national policy despite, Taubes argues, evidence that was considerably weaker than the policy implied. This historical section is the strongest part of the book. The story of how a hypothesis with genuine evidential gaps became enshrined in dietary guidelines through a combination of institutional momentum, strong personalities, and political expediency is a genuinely important piece of science history.\n\nThe second half builds Taubes's alternative. Carbohydrates, not fat, are the primary driver of obesity, heart disease, diabetes, and a range of other chronic conditions. The mechanism is insulin: dietary carbohydrates elevate blood sugar, which elevates insulin, which drives fat storage and inhibits fat burning. The corollary is that a low-carb, higher-fat diet should be the default for health, and that the population-wide shift to low-fat, high-carb eating that followed the dietary guidelines has been a catastrophic public-health error.\n\nThe argument is presented with extraordinary detail. Taubes cites hundreds of studies, walks through the biochemistry in real depth, and constructs a narrative that is internally coherent and, for many readers, convincing. The prose is dense but clear, and the book rewards careful reading even when one disagrees with the conclusions.\n\n## Where the science stands\n\nThe historical critique has held up reasonably well. The low-fat consensus was indeed built on evidence weaker than its proponents claimed, and the subsequent decades have broadly supported the view that dietary fat per se is a less important driver of chronic disease than was believed in the 1980s. This is now mainstream rather than controversial, and Taubes deserves some credit for saying it early and loudly.\n\nThe alternative hypothesis has fared less well. The carbohydrate-insulin model of obesity has been tested more directly in the years since the book was published, and the results have been mixed at best. The NuSI initiative, which Taubes co-founded specifically to fund rigorous testing of the hypothesis, produced studies (notably Kevin Hall's metabolic-ward trials) that did not support the strong version of the insulin model. Low-carb diets produce weight loss, but not through the specific insulin-mediated mechanism Taubes describes, and not meaningfully more than isocaloric diets with different macronutrient compositions when food intake is carefully controlled. The energy-balance model Taubes attacks turns out to be more resilient than he predicted, even if it is not the whole story.\n\nTaubes has also been criticised for selective citation. Researchers whose work is cited in the book have pointed out that Taubes emphasises findings that support his thesis and minimises or omits findings that complicate it. This is a common problem in popular science, but it matters more in a book that frames itself as a corrective to exactly this kind of selectivity in the opposing camp.\n\n## Who should read this\n\nThis is for the intellectually ambitious reader who wants to understand how the low-carb movement got started and why the nutrition-science establishment became so polarised. For the reader interested in the politics and sociology of science as much as in the science itself. For anyone who wants the full-length version of the argument that Taubes later condensed into the more accessible Why We Get Fat.\n\nIt is not the right book for a general reader looking for practical dietary guidance. At 640 pages it is an enormous commitment, and the practical take-home (eat fewer refined carbohydrates) does not require the full historical apparatus to justify. Readers who want the argument without the depth should read Why We Get Fat instead. Readers who want the most current and balanced picture of obesity science should read Stephan Guyenet's The Hungry Brain, which engages with many of the same questions from a broader evidential base.\n\n## Strengths and weaknesses\n\nThe strength is the history. Taubes is a skilled investigative journalist, and the first half of the book is as good a piece of science-policy history as the nutrition genre has produced. The story of how the low-fat consensus was built is genuinely worth understanding, and Taubes tells it with detail and force.\n\nThe weaknesses are in the second half. The alternative hypothesis is presented as more settled than it is. The evidence is curated to build a case rather than surveyed to find the truth. And the book's own standard - that scientific consensus should be based on rigorous evidence rather than institutional momentum - has been turned against it by subsequent research that has not confirmed the strong insulin model.\n\nA 2.5 is right. The book is intellectually important and historically valuable, and the central alternative hypothesis has not held up as well as Taubes predicted. Read it for the history. Hold the prescription lightly.\n\n## Why this matters for mental health\n\nThe practical advice embedded in the book - eat fewer refined carbohydrates, eat more whole foods, be sceptical of processed low-fat products - aligns with what the nutritional-psychiatry literature supports. Diets high in ultra-processed carbohydrates have been associated with worse mental health outcomes, and replacing them with whole foods tends to improve mood and energy. The concern, as with several books on this list, is not the practical advice but the theoretical framework. A single-cause model of a complex condition can create the kind of rigid, all-or-nothing dietary thinking that is itself a risk factor for poor mental health. For the Mind Wobble reader, the useful kernel is the dietary advice, not the comprehensive theory.\n\n## Final verdict\n\nGood Calories, Bad Calories is an intellectually ambitious book that is more valuable as history than as science. The critique of the low-fat consensus is durable and worth reading. The alternative hypothesis is provocative but has been partially undermined by subsequent research. Read it if you want to understand how the nutrition wars began. Do not treat it as the final word on what to eat - the field has moved on, and the balanced picture is available elsewhere.",[13],"Gary Taubes","Knopf","https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/100052/good-calories-bad-calories-by-gary-taubes/","https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B000UZNSC2",2007,"9781400040780",640,[21,22,23,24],"hardcover","paperback","ebook","audiobook","English","2.5",false,15,"Readers interested in the intellectual history of the low-carb movement and the politics of nutrition science - read critically and alongside the rebuttals.",null,[32,33,34],"The history of how the low-fat dietary consensus was established is genuinely worth understanding, and Taubes tells it in detail.","The alternative hypothesis - that carbohydrates rather than fat are the primary driver of obesity and chronic disease - is presented with more certainty than the evidence supports.","The book launched a movement but has been substantially contested by subsequent research, including studies Taubes himself helped fund.",[36,37],"Intellectually ambitious, deeply researched, and genuinely important as a history of nutrition-science politics.","Correctly identified that the low-fat consensus was built on weaker evidence than its proponents claimed.",[39,40,41],"Selectively presents the evidence to build a case rather than surveying the full picture.","The carbohydrate-insulin hypothesis has not held up as well as the book predicted, including in studies Taubes co-funded through NuSI.","At 640 pages, the book is dense to the point of being inaccessible for most general readers.","hugo",{"slug":42,"name":44,"profile_photo":45,"author_type":46,"role":47,"tagline":48,"experience_summary":49,"expertise_areas":50,"credential_highlights":58,"social_links":65},"Hugo","/images/hugo2.jpg","human","Founder & Lead Writer","Founder of Mind Wobble, writing about mental health through lived experience, research, practical experimentation, and a background in personal training and sports therapy.","Hugo has spent years exploring journaling, sleep, nutrition, exercise, and digital tools to better understand anxiety, low mood, confidence, and recovery. With a background in personal training and sports therapy, he turns that work into practical guidance for Mind Wobble readers.",[51,52,53,54,55,56,57],"mental health journaling","sleep and mental health","nutrition and mental health","exercise and mental health","digital wellbeing tools","AI-assisted journaling and self-reflection","anxiety and confidence management",[59,60,61,62,63,64],"Founder of Mind Wobble","Qualified Personal Trainer & Sports Therapist","Over a decade of personal mental health research and self-experimentation","Writes from lived experience with anxiety, poor sleep, confidence challenges, and low mood","Research-led writer focused on practical mental health self-understanding","Combines exercise science background with mental health writing",[],[67,68,69,70,71],"nutrition-history","low-carb","diet-science","insulin","science-politics","2026-04-16",[74],"nutrition",[76],"Nutrition & Mental Health",[78,89,102,117],{"slug":79,"name":80,"cover":81,"featured_image":81,"meta_title":82,"logo":81,"favourite":27,"date_created":72,"overview":83,"book_authors":84,"publisher":14,"publication_year":85,"formats":86,"page_count":87,"price_low":88,"price_high":88},"why-we-get-fat","Why We Get Fat: And What to Do About It","/images/books/why-we-get-fat/cover.jpg","Why We Get Fat - Mind Wobble Review","Gary Taubes's accessible pitch for the carbohydrate-insulin hypothesis - clear and provocative, but the thesis has been partially undermined by subsequent research.",[13],2010,[21,22,23,24],272,17,{"slug":90,"name":91,"cover":92,"featured_image":92,"meta_title":93,"logo":92,"favourite":27,"date_created":72,"overview":94,"book_authors":95,"publisher":97,"publication_year":98,"formats":99,"page_count":100,"price_low":101,"price_high":101},"the-obesity-code","The Obesity Code: Unlocking the Secrets of Weight Loss","/images/books/the-obesity-code/cover.jpg","The Obesity Code - Mind Wobble Review","Jason Fung's insulin-focused model of obesity - readable and provocative, but more contested than the confident tone suggests.",[96],"Jason Fung","Greystone Books",2016,[21,22,23,24],296,22.95,{"slug":103,"name":104,"cover":105,"featured_image":105,"meta_title":106,"logo":105,"favourite":27,"date_created":107,"overview":108,"book_authors":109,"publisher":111,"publication_year":112,"formats":113,"page_count":114,"price_low":115,"price_high":116},"grain-brain","Grain Brain: The Surprising Truth about Wheat, Carbs, and Sugar - Your Brain's Silent Killers","/images/books/grain-brain/cover.jpg","Grain Brain - Mind Wobble Review","2026-04-15","A commercially huge anti-grain book on brain health - mainstream neurology and nutrition science do not endorse the central claims.",[110],"David Perlmutter","Little, Brown Spark",2013,[21,22,23,24],336,14.99,42,{"slug":118,"name":119,"cover":120,"featured_image":120,"meta_title":121,"logo":120,"favourite":27,"date_created":107,"overview":122,"book_authors":123,"publisher":125,"publication_year":126,"formats":127,"page_count":128,"price_low":129,"price_high":129},"wheat-belly","Wheat Belly: Lose the Wheat, Lose the Weight, and Find Your Path Back to Health","/images/books/wheat-belly/cover.jpg","Wheat Belly - Mind Wobble Review","A commercially huge, scientifically weak book arguing modern wheat is the root cause of most chronic disease - widely disputed by mainstream nutrition science.",[124],"William Davis","Rodale Books",2011,[21,22,23,24],304,19.99,[131,138,145,151],{"slug":132,"title":133,"featured_image":134,"excerpt":135,"date_created":136,"reading_time":137},"does-a-glass-of-wine-help-you-sleep-nightcap-myth","Does a Glass of Wine Actually Help You Sleep? The Nightcap Myth, Explained","/images/news/Does-A-Glass-Of-Wine-Actually-Help-You-Sleep-The-Nightcap-Myth-Explained.jpg","A nightcap feels like it helps you drift off, but it sedates you early and fragments the rest of your night. Here's what wine really does to your sleep and your mood, and how to wind down without it.","2026-06-08T14:04:06Z","12.5 min",{"slug":139,"title":140,"featured_image":141,"excerpt":142,"date_created":143,"reading_time":144},"do-vegetarians-and-vegans-benefit-more-from-creatine","Do Vegetarians and Vegans Benefit More from Creatine?","images/news/Do-Vegetarians-And-Vegans-Benefit-More-From-Creatine.jpg","Vegetarians and vegans typically start with lower creatine stores than meat-eaters. Here's what the research actually says about whether supplementing delivers bigger benefits for muscle, mood, and the brain.","2026-05-25T19:21:54.000Z","13.5 min",{"slug":146,"title":147,"featured_image":148,"excerpt":149,"date_created":150,"reading_time":137},"blood-sugar-and-mood-mental-health","Blood Sugar and Mood: Why the Glucose Rollercoaster Is Quietly Wrecking Your Mental Health","/images/news/Blood-Sugar-And-Mood-Why-The-Glucose-Rollercoaster-Is-Quietly-Wrecking-Your-Mental-Health.jpg","Your afternoon mood crash isn't a personality flaw, it's blood sugar. Here's how glucose swings shape anxiety, focus, and mood, and what small shifts actually help.","2026-05-18T14:24:59.915Z",{"slug":152,"title":153,"featured_image":154,"excerpt":155,"date_created":156,"reading_time":157},"gaba-the-neurotransmitter-your-anxious-brain-is-begging-for","GABA: The Neurotransmitter Your Anxious Brain Is Begging For","/images/news/Gaba-The-Neurotransmitter-Your-Anxious-Brain-Is-Begging-For.jpg","GABA is your brain's built-in calming system, and when it falls short, anxiety and sleepless nights follow. Here's what the science says about how it works and how to support it naturally.","2026-04-24T00:00:00Z","14 min",[159,167,175,183],{"slug":160,"name":161,"featured_image":162,"meta_title":163,"logo":164,"favourite":27,"date_created":165,"overview":166},"forks-over-knives-app-easy-plant-based-recipes-and-wellness","Fork Over Knives","/images/software/fork-over-knives/featured-image.jpg","Forks Over Knives App: Easy Plant-Based Recipes & Wellness","/images/software/fork-over-knives/logo.jpeg","2025-11-06T14:56:40.469Z","Discover the Forks Over Knives app—1,000+ plant-based recipes, smart grocery lists, and mindful cooking tools. Cook healthy, live well, and enjoy lifelong access",{"slug":168,"name":169,"featured_image":170,"meta_title":171,"logo":172,"favourite":27,"date_created":173,"overview":174},"samsung-food-app-smart-meal-planning-and-recipe-manager","Samsung Food","/images/software/samsung-food/featured-image.jpg","Samsung Food App: Smart Meal Planning & Recipe Manager","/images/software/samsung-food/logo.jpg","2025-11-06T14:24:44.571Z","Simplify cooking and grocery shopping with Samsung Food — an all-in-one app for meal planning, recipe organisation, and nutrition tracking. Try it free today!",{"slug":176,"name":177,"featured_image":178,"meta_title":179,"logo":180,"favourite":27,"date_created":181,"overview":182},"side-chef-app-guided-cooking-and-mindful-meal-planning","SideChef","/images/software/sidechef/featured-image.jpg","SideChef App: Guided Cooking & Mindful Meal Planning","/images/software/sidechef/logo.jpg","2025-11-06T12:40:55.980Z","Discover SideChef — the cooking app that builds confidence with step-by-step recipes, voice guidance, and meal planning tools for a more mindful kitchen.",{"slug":184,"name":185,"featured_image":186,"meta_title":187,"logo":188,"favourite":27,"date_created":189,"overview":190},"paprika-recipe-manager","Paprika Recipe Manager","/images/software/paprika-recipe-manager/featured-image.jpg","Paprika Recipe Manager – Simplify Meal Planning & Cooking","/images/software/paprika-recipe-manager/logo.png","2025-11-06T12:19:10.180Z","Discover Paprika Recipe Manager, the ultimate tool to save, plan, and cook stress-free. Organize recipes, create grocery lists, and sync across all devices easily.",{"data":192,"body":195,"excerpt":-1,"toc":307},{"title":193,"description":194},"","Good Calories, Bad Calories is the book that launched a thousand low-carb arguments. Gary Taubes, a science journalist with a track record of long-form investigative work, published it in 2007 to immediate controversy. At 640 pages of densely argued revisionist history, it set out to dismantle the consensus that dietary fat was the primary driver of obesity and heart disease, and to replace it with an alternative hypothesis centring carbohydrates and insulin. The book was praised by some researchers as a much-needed corrective and attacked by others as a selectively argued polemic. Nearly two decades later, it remains the intellectual origin text of the modern low-carb movement - and a book that subsequent research, including studies Taubes himself helped fund, has partially undermined. A Mind Wobble review has to hold both of those facts at once.",{"type":196,"children":197},"root",[198,205,212,217,222,227,233,238,243,248,254,259,264,270,275,280,285,291,296,302],{"type":199,"tag":200,"props":201,"children":202},"element","p",{},[203],{"type":204,"value":194},"text",{"type":199,"tag":206,"props":207,"children":209},"h2",{"id":208},"what-the-book-covers",[210],{"type":204,"value":211},"What the book covers",{"type":199,"tag":200,"props":213,"children":214},{},[215],{"type":204,"value":216},"Taubes's project is enormous in scope. The first half of the book is a forensic history of how the low-fat dietary consensus was established in the United States between the 1950s and the 1980s. Taubes traces the political, institutional, and scientific dynamics that led Ancel Keys's diet-heart hypothesis - the idea that dietary saturated fat raises cholesterol, which causes heart disease - to become national policy despite, Taubes argues, evidence that was considerably weaker than the policy implied. This historical section is the strongest part of the book. The story of how a hypothesis with genuine evidential gaps became enshrined in dietary guidelines through a combination of institutional momentum, strong personalities, and political expediency is a genuinely important piece of science history.",{"type":199,"tag":200,"props":218,"children":219},{},[220],{"type":204,"value":221},"The second half builds Taubes's alternative. Carbohydrates, not fat, are the primary driver of obesity, heart disease, diabetes, and a range of other chronic conditions. The mechanism is insulin: dietary carbohydrates elevate blood sugar, which elevates insulin, which drives fat storage and inhibits fat burning. The corollary is that a low-carb, higher-fat diet should be the default for health, and that the population-wide shift to low-fat, high-carb eating that followed the dietary guidelines has been a catastrophic public-health error.",{"type":199,"tag":200,"props":223,"children":224},{},[225],{"type":204,"value":226},"The argument is presented with extraordinary detail. Taubes cites hundreds of studies, walks through the biochemistry in real depth, and constructs a narrative that is internally coherent and, for many readers, convincing. The prose is dense but clear, and the book rewards careful reading even when one disagrees with the conclusions.",{"type":199,"tag":206,"props":228,"children":230},{"id":229},"where-the-science-stands",[231],{"type":204,"value":232},"Where the science stands",{"type":199,"tag":200,"props":234,"children":235},{},[236],{"type":204,"value":237},"The historical critique has held up reasonably well. The low-fat consensus was indeed built on evidence weaker than its proponents claimed, and the subsequent decades have broadly supported the view that dietary fat per se is a less important driver of chronic disease than was believed in the 1980s. This is now mainstream rather than controversial, and Taubes deserves some credit for saying it early and loudly.",{"type":199,"tag":200,"props":239,"children":240},{},[241],{"type":204,"value":242},"The alternative hypothesis has fared less well. The carbohydrate-insulin model of obesity has been tested more directly in the years since the book was published, and the results have been mixed at best. The NuSI initiative, which Taubes co-founded specifically to fund rigorous testing of the hypothesis, produced studies (notably Kevin Hall's metabolic-ward trials) that did not support the strong version of the insulin model. Low-carb diets produce weight loss, but not through the specific insulin-mediated mechanism Taubes describes, and not meaningfully more than isocaloric diets with different macronutrient compositions when food intake is carefully controlled. The energy-balance model Taubes attacks turns out to be more resilient than he predicted, even if it is not the whole story.",{"type":199,"tag":200,"props":244,"children":245},{},[246],{"type":204,"value":247},"Taubes has also been criticised for selective citation. Researchers whose work is cited in the book have pointed out that Taubes emphasises findings that support his thesis and minimises or omits findings that complicate it. This is a common problem in popular science, but it matters more in a book that frames itself as a corrective to exactly this kind of selectivity in the opposing camp.",{"type":199,"tag":206,"props":249,"children":251},{"id":250},"who-should-read-this",[252],{"type":204,"value":253},"Who should read this",{"type":199,"tag":200,"props":255,"children":256},{},[257],{"type":204,"value":258},"This is for the intellectually ambitious reader who wants to understand how the low-carb movement got started and why the nutrition-science establishment became so polarised. For the reader interested in the politics and sociology of science as much as in the science itself. For anyone who wants the full-length version of the argument that Taubes later condensed into the more accessible Why We Get Fat.",{"type":199,"tag":200,"props":260,"children":261},{},[262],{"type":204,"value":263},"It is not the right book for a general reader looking for practical dietary guidance. At 640 pages it is an enormous commitment, and the practical take-home (eat fewer refined carbohydrates) does not require the full historical apparatus to justify. Readers who want the argument without the depth should read Why We Get Fat instead. Readers who want the most current and balanced picture of obesity science should read Stephan Guyenet's The Hungry Brain, which engages with many of the same questions from a broader evidential base.",{"type":199,"tag":206,"props":265,"children":267},{"id":266},"strengths-and-weaknesses",[268],{"type":204,"value":269},"Strengths and weaknesses",{"type":199,"tag":200,"props":271,"children":272},{},[273],{"type":204,"value":274},"The strength is the history. Taubes is a skilled investigative journalist, and the first half of the book is as good a piece of science-policy history as the nutrition genre has produced. The story of how the low-fat consensus was built is genuinely worth understanding, and Taubes tells it with detail and force.",{"type":199,"tag":200,"props":276,"children":277},{},[278],{"type":204,"value":279},"The weaknesses are in the second half. The alternative hypothesis is presented as more settled than it is. The evidence is curated to build a case rather than surveyed to find the truth. And the book's own standard - that scientific consensus should be based on rigorous evidence rather than institutional momentum - has been turned against it by subsequent research that has not confirmed the strong insulin model.",{"type":199,"tag":200,"props":281,"children":282},{},[283],{"type":204,"value":284},"A 2.5 is right. The book is intellectually important and historically valuable, and the central alternative hypothesis has not held up as well as Taubes predicted. Read it for the history. Hold the prescription lightly.",{"type":199,"tag":206,"props":286,"children":288},{"id":287},"why-this-matters-for-mental-health",[289],{"type":204,"value":290},"Why this matters for mental health",{"type":199,"tag":200,"props":292,"children":293},{},[294],{"type":204,"value":295},"The practical advice embedded in the book - eat fewer refined carbohydrates, eat more whole foods, be sceptical of processed low-fat products - aligns with what the nutritional-psychiatry literature supports. Diets high in ultra-processed carbohydrates have been associated with worse mental health outcomes, and replacing them with whole foods tends to improve mood and energy. The concern, as with several books on this list, is not the practical advice but the theoretical framework. A single-cause model of a complex condition can create the kind of rigid, all-or-nothing dietary thinking that is itself a risk factor for poor mental health. For the Mind Wobble reader, the useful kernel is the dietary advice, not the comprehensive theory.",{"type":199,"tag":206,"props":297,"children":299},{"id":298},"final-verdict",[300],{"type":204,"value":301},"Final verdict",{"type":199,"tag":200,"props":303,"children":304},{},[305],{"type":204,"value":306},"Good Calories, Bad Calories is an intellectually ambitious book that is more valuable as history than as science. The critique of the low-fat consensus is durable and worth reading. The alternative hypothesis is provocative but has been partially undermined by subsequent research. Read it if you want to understand how the nutrition wars began. Do not treat it as the final word on what to eat - the field has moved on, and the balanced picture is available elsewhere.",{"title":193,"searchDepth":308,"depth":308,"links":309},2,[310,311,312,313,314,315],{"id":208,"depth":308,"text":211},{"id":229,"depth":308,"text":232},{"id":250,"depth":308,"text":253},{"id":266,"depth":308,"text":269},{"id":287,"depth":308,"text":290},{"id":298,"depth":308,"text":301},1780930536603]